Should Michael Phelps be required to share his wealth of gold medals with competitors a la Obama concept? - business gold rewards
If Michael Phelps has a budget of about 4 gold medals at the Olympic Games and the IOC should distribute assistance as they deem appropriate, with those who had none or less, and Obama held in the economic / financial aid?
In view of the Obama spread wealth, some of which will be less high-income source of its competitors, which is a source of income.
Is it unfair competition with others for their hard work and skill, perhaps, better training and conditioning, but then turn around and stock allocations with cost competitive?
Tuesday, January 19, 2010
Business Gold Rewards Should Michael Phelps Be Required To Share His Wealth Of Gold Medals With Competitors A La Obama Concept?
5 comments:
Obama would take 4.5 gold medals and give Somone who do not ........ only be fair.
If a better education in public schools, then no problem with them running a little more.
If the university is paid a Pell Grant, there is nothing wrong with them a little more.
The success does not come in isolation. He lives in the United States, the upper class in order to be successful, why can not they pay a little more, and to celebrate this success?
hahahahahaha! Thank you. Very well said.
BHO does not think Mike wants medals. He wants Mike certain that the money is put it rakes in the adoption of hope for the love of Mike safest in the bag before January.
I'm not jealous, I earn money from Mike. I am proud that he is an American.
No, Bush did not give the medals back at work and challenging classes. The Bush tax cuts should be ultra-rich, to be returned to work and the working class.
Money is not gold. Governments do not run in the gold metal. This kind of that explain what to do. He died a few years ago for harassment and a race of zombies took his place.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3htTdAh3v ...
Post a Comment